<html>
<head>
<title>punk fashion</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#000000" link="#ffffff" vlink="#bfbfbf">
<font size="4" color="#ffffff" face="verdana">PUNK FASHION<p>
<font size="2"> <br><br>
<td><img src="sex.jpg" border="0"></td><p>
"Plastic trash bags, bondage wear, Nazi regalia, slashed clothing held together with safety pins, multicolored hair
spiked up with Vaseline, lurid make-up, and, most shocking of all, safety pins worn through fleshócheeks, lips, nostrils, and
ears" (Henry, p. 80). This is a description of the fans at a Sex Pistols concert in 1976. In the early 1970s the musical
movement known as ìpunkî began. This movement challenged the norms of modern culture not only through its fast paced, loud,
chaotic and violent music, but also through its fashion. Prior to the early 1980s many punks followed a do-it-yourself
(DIY) mentality that created an anti-capitalistic stance towards society. However, in 1979 after the break up of the most
well known British punk band, the Sex Pistols, the punk subculture had created enough media recognition that it was placed
in a position to become capitalized. Already by the early 1980s movies, television shows, and non-punk musical artists,
such as Madonna were imitating punk fashion. Twenty years later fashion and hair companies such as Prada, Kenneth Cole, Bed
Head and Wella, are turning punk fashion into profit. Punk style that was once considered offensive is now considered high
fashion.<p>
In the spirit of many rock and roll movements that challenged the ideals of mainstream society, such as The Beatles
or Janis Joplin, the punk movement followed in their footsteps. However, different from these movements the punk movement
emphasized a do-it-yourself attitude towards everything. As Greil Marcus states in LipStick Traces, thousands of punk bands
were formed within a span of about seven years (Marcus, p.46). Despite the fact that most of these bands had no formal music
education (or any music education for that matter) the idea was to create it on your own. This idea manifested its way
into taking what was known as rock and roll music and tearing it apart until it became almost unrecognizable. Bands still
used guitars, bass guitars, drums, and a singer but not in any "conventional" way. Bands played louder, faster, and harder
then any rock music that came before it. Punk music used the basic elements of what was know as rock and roll and torn them
apart and created them into something new.<p>
This same idea of tearing apart what was seen as mainstream in the music manifested its way into the fashion in the
same context. For example, while mainstream society was wearing three piece suits, the punk subculture was cutting up these
suits and safety pinning them back together. In Break All the Rules!, Trica Henry quotes Caroline Coon describing the
fashion of Johnny Rotten, the lead singer for the Sex Pistols. She states, "It was after feeling particularly hostile of
Chelsea's wealth and well-groomed finery that Johnny [Rotten] bought (or acquired) a brand new suit, shirt, and tie. He took
it home and slashed it to pieces. He pinned and stapled it together again. And then he wore it" (Henry, p.74). Similar to
the music, the fashion in the punk subculture required taking articles of clothing with a specific meaning and redefining
them.<p>
In Dick Hebdige's book, Subculture: The Meaning of Style, he explores this re-appropriation of clothing within the
punk subculture. He states that the punks were,"adapting images, styles, and ideologies made available elsewhere on
television and in films,in magazines and newspapers (high fashion, the emergence of feminism in its commodity form, e.g.
Cosmopolitan) in order to construct an alternative identity which communicated a perceived difference: Otherness. They were,
in short, challenging at a symbolic level the inevitability, the "naturalness" of class and gender stereotypes"
(Hebdige, p. 89). Punks were using clothing as a signifier of meaning. For example, Johnny Rotten was not following the
rules of the culture of power to move ahead by wearing a three-piece suit. Instead he was using the three-piece suit as a
signifier of upper-class culture to make a statement about classism and anti-conformity. As Hebdige states above this was
an action which challenged social class status.<p>
To suggest that all punks of the early 1970s wore specific clothing to make political statements about classism and
gender roles would probably be a mistake. As Craig O'Hara suggests in his book, The Philosophy of Punk, he states that the
early punk movement was more about anti-conformity. He says, "Conformity is rejected on every front possible in order to
seek the truth or sometimes to merely shock people" (O'Hara, p. 27). The punks managed to shock mainstream society by
creating styles that fell outside of the social norms. For example, punk men were wearing just as much makeup as women were.
Men were blackening their eyes and even drawing fangs down the side of their faces (Henry, p.85). This large movement of
punks shocking mainstream society forced people to question what was acceptable appearance and what was not.<p>
The punks managed to create enough media attention that people did start to question appropriate means of appearance
and the fashion industry started to change. Fashion companies started to pick up on punk styles and sell them back into
mainstream society. This action in itself had defeated the punk idea of anti-capitalism and anti-conformity. Hebdige speaks
about the idea of the conversion subcultureís signs into mass produced objects. He states,"the creation and diffusion of
new styles is inextricably bound up in the process of production, publicity and packaging which must inevitably lead to the
defusion of the subcultureís subversive poweróboth mod and punk innovations fed back directly into high fashion and
mainstream fashion" (Hebdige, p.95). The original shocking power the punks had through appearance dissipated once mainstream
society taped into it. The commodifaction of style contradicted the idea of originality. By the 1980's punks were able to
buy punk fashions over the counter.<p>
Today punk fashion has become incredibly ingrained in mainstream society and in high fashion. This season Prada
models have saggy spiked hair. In almost any magazine that looks at youth culture you can see hair dyed in artificial colors
such as blue or green. Many malls in the United States now carry a store called Hot Topic where you can buy any punk
accessory that you can dream of, even a pair of red plaid pants for eighty dollars. The punk movement with the intent to
question conformity through fashion loses its meaning when society turns punk fashions into profit. A fifteen-year-old youth
that buys a mass produced spiked bracelet is not seen as an act of rebellion when they wear the bracelet, according to
original punk ideology. This youth is no longer questioning anti-conformity. However, if a fifteen-year-old youth from
Utah, who lives in a highly religious community, makes a T-shirt that says something to the extent of ìYou are all sheepî and
then wears it, this may still be considered rebellion in the eyes of the early punk movement. Even though punk fashions have
been exploited and commodified, this second youth has questioned their surrounding environment and become a producer of their
own fashion.<p>
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QVG130ieKng"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QVG130ieKng" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<a href="sex pistols grundy.html"> next <p>
<a href="interviews.html"> back <p>
<a href="index.html"> home <br><br>
</body>
</html>